@article{Violante_2020, title={The extended concept of ‘Thirdness’ in the philosophy of law.}, url={https://www.mimesisjournals.com/ojs/index.php/tcrs/article/view/287}, abstractNote={<p>The expression ‘Thirdness’ has not been analysed by law as it would require to: it only concerns the profile of the judge – which is strictly reductionist – contrary to a wider and deeper meaning that could be achieved, dealing with the ‘hermeneutic turn’, which has rethought to the concepts of “prejudice” and “precomprehension”.</p> <p>To broach the defining difficulty, we should extend to the conceptualizations of Alexandre Kojève, as treated in “Lines of a Phenomenology of Law”, reshaping the Hegelian “dialectic” between the Slave and the Lord.</p> <p>On another direction, the subject entails a connection to the Lacanian psychoanalysis, as rethought by Bruno Romano and, in particular, to the conjunction between ‘logos’ and ‘nomos’, guaranteed by the “symbolic ring”.</p> <p>The concept of ‘Thirdness’ can’t be defined once and for all, but should be considered as an empty space – not mine, neither yours – opened to the research of meaning.</p&gt;}, journal={Teoria e Critica della Regolazione Sociale / Theory and Criticism of Social Regulation}, author={Violante, Martina}, year={2020}, month={Nov.} }